Examiner Report On The Ph. D ThesisExaminer’s Report on the Ph. D thesis
Examiner’s Report on the Ph. D thesis Examiner: Tadao Takaoka Title: Sequential and Parallel Algorithms for the Generalized Maximum Subarray Problem
Examiner Report On The Ph. D Thesis
The internal was the first choice of my committee and on my list, pretty much a no-brainer. The main one was that i liked his writing, i liked his approach to research, and he was definitely not a positivist! It was suggested to me that when choosing an examiner you should think of your future, because this is someone who will potentially write references for you. Your supervisor may not be reading the same sorts of literature and may be unaware of who is out there so help them out.
Hell ask me lots about politics, but hell go light on the theory. Let me explain, my thesis was not a phd thesis but a master thesis, which had a passing grade. I didnt have a choice in the internal one, and i made the mistake of letting the internal one choose the external one someone neither i nor my supervisors knew.
Doctoral writing sig the thesis whisperer is dedicated to helping research students everywhere. You shouldnt avoid making friends with people in your field, but do avoid sending them any drafts to comment on as this is usually the reason why such people will be excluded from examining you. After really discouraging comments from my supervisor about my very low skills about everything related to my thesis (english, topic, the fact that was macrodata instead his passion microdata) the day of my defence was scheduled.
Although i wholeheartedly agree with the suggestion to pick someone sympathetic with your methodology i had the strange experience of suggesting an examiner who himself had written a lot of broad studies similar to mine, in fact he was very much one of my research models and i included many of his ideas in my discussions, and then his report listed criticisms (such as that it was very broad in scope etc) all of which applied to his own work. Make a list of your five favourite academic writers within your topic domain and google stalk them. It is something that can make or break the very final moment, after 3-4 years of hard work, but rarely discussed openly.
But she criticised me for things i think she did herself! Sometimes there is a blindness to the self which you just cant predict. I found it helpful to realise that while being asked to suggest my own examiners provided the illusion of control over how my work would be judged, in reality it was something i had no control over. My supervisor and i can only think perhaps he felt i was treading too closely into his area.
I didnt realise they worked together and had a particular agenda (which i hadnt addressed adequately, and didnt know enough about to defend myself against). Glad to hear you passed i assume? Yes i did, the other examiner actually recommended it as being in his top 5 of theses ever examined. So you may not get what you think youre going to get! However, overall, it was a really positive experience. As an author, if it passes, i have some great books in it for the mass market. My thesis explored a new topic which not too much literature was published about.
Crawford PhD - Examiners' reports -- what do they look like?
The study analysed examiners’ reports for 62 PhD theses. Each thesis had three external examiners, ... 4 things you should know about choosing examiners for your ...
Examiner Report On The Ph. D ThesisPhD thesis quality: The views of examiners Keynote address ...
PhD thesis quality: The views of examiners ... of Newcastle. Australia 1 Stellenbosch University, ... information is the content of the written examiner report
Examiner Report On The Ph. D Thesis It is edited by page if you are interested in writing for us. The use of scope and breadth when referring to another phd is often used in academia to put a student or supervisor down. I am also using informations systems and natural sciences as my basis. Im not particularly kindhearted i just understand that the phd degree accredits you as fit to begin a career as a researcher not as a star in your research field. Shop the largest selection of nike nfl pro bowl jerseys for men, women, and kids for sale from us 2015. I would recommend picking the top people in your field that dont have a reputation to be jerks. I am comforted by the fact that my supervisor said nearly everything written above and asked for a long suggested list of examiners, discussing each with me. Include names and short profiles of each person you have chosen as well as your rationale for why they would be a good examiner.
4 things you should know about choosing examiners for your ...
Another element to consider, especially with external examiners will the board clear them to undertake the viva? My first external was not, on the basis that he taught on an ma and had never examined a phd before (talk about gatekeepers!) this despite he was a renowned comic book artist, writer, and critic, and my thesis & novel centered on the notions of hypermasculinity in comic book fiction. In retrospect, i can see that the problematic examiner had never explicitly published their commitment to my methodological framework, and that i made a serious mistake in assuming they would be sympathetic to my approach. But a defense is stressful enough, no need to increase the stress level by inviting someone who likes to tear people up. After my defense people congratulated me how well i had handled the somewhat jerk-ish internal examiner. You may have entirely the opposite criteria, but either way its vitality important the examiner understands, and is sympathetic to, the way you are attempting to make knowledge.
The thesis whisperer i was just wondering about the outcome of a thesis with a very badly written and edited draft chapter and missing a conclusion chapter? Would it be resubmission? How can i defend myself? What to do when your thesis is rejected by the examiners the thesis whisperer firstly of all, thanks for this useful comments. Cutting it back to 100,000 was incredibly difficult because i kept imaging the examiners saying but she should have included in fact, i kept imagining every possible criticism. Luckily my second examiner was much more positive, how much is broad in scope an issue with most examiners (she asks nervously)? What specifically did he identify as the problem with being broad in scope? Did he then recommend a fail, given he didnt suggest changes? No not at all, he recommended it for pass with no changes, which is, i guess, good though frustrating. In fact, everyones comments here make me think theres another post to be written on when the rules dont work or something. Let me explain, my thesis was not a phd thesis but a master thesis, which had a passing grade.
I, too, had no-one in my exact discipline, whatever it is. You only need worry about such things if the editor asks you for advice on names. Doctoral writing sig the thesis whisperer is dedicated to helping research students everywhere. There is nothing you can do until you get the feedback. Lynne, i dont know you at all but i want to give you a bit of advice. In that case, someone who is well-known in your particular subject area might feel that their turf is being encroached upon, and take a reactive position. I ended up with major corrections, and had to spend another year working on my thesis (not a direct result of examiners, of course, but i do think it contributed) maybe im a complete softie, but id also recommend seeing how your prospective examiner critiques other peoples work. The internal was the first choice of my committee and on my list, pretty much a no-brainer. There was a case i know of where the student had quoted such a reference, and had commented on it favourably, but unfortunately the examiner was a different person who happened to have the name surname and initials. At rmit, and many other places, the student does not choose the examiners the supervisor does.61 thoughts on “ 4 things you should know about choosing examiners for your thesis ... a PhD thesis but a master thesis ... you should know about choosing examiners ...